This table is adapted from Hardcastle et al (2017).
Coaches can refer to this table for a reminder of different MI techniques to apply whilst coaching, either in a live video call or within the asynchronous intervention messages. Examples are given of how this might sound.
In practice coaches are likely to use a combination of multiple techniques, with some being more relevant for managing barriers to change that occur during the course of a Liva programme. You can refer to the handbook for more support in managing these barriers.
No. | Relational or Content | Technique | Definition | Example |
|---|
No. | Relational or Content | Technique | Definition | Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Relational | Open-ended questions | The coach asks a question that does not have a limited response | 'What have you tried before to make a change?’ and ‘How can I help with xxx?' |
2 | Relational | Affirmation | The coach provides a statement of affirmation that acknowledges the person’s difficulties, efforts and self-worth. | “I’ve enjoyed talking with you today” “I enjoy reading your updates and hearing from you” |
3 | Relational | Reflective statement | The coach paraphrases user comments by repeating back what the user has said. | “It sounds like you …” or “The message I’m getting is that …” |
4 | Relational | Summary statement | The coach pulls everything together that the user has said and offers a summary | ‘So on the one hand, you feel that xxx and on the other xxx’ |
5 | Relational | Agenda mapping | The coach prompts the user to consider the way ahead and which behaviour they are motivated to discuss. | “I usually talk to people in a situation like yours about diet, exercise, sleep, stress or hydration. Which of these do you feel you would like to talk about?” |
6 | Relational | Review a typical day | A prompt from the coach to build rapport while collecting information. | “Can we spend the next 5 minutes going through a typical day for you from beginning to end, and where (behaviour) fits in?” |
7 | Relational | Permission to provide information and advice | The coach obtains the permission of the user before providing information or advice. | “Would it be helpful if I tell you what has worked for other people or what they have found useful?” |
8 | Relational | Elicit-provide-elicit | The coach first elicits the user’s understanding and need for information, then neutrally provides information, followed by eliciting what this information might mean for the user. | “You mention feeling confused by xxx topic, would it be useful for me to share more about this?” and then “How does this information fit with what you know? What are the next steps for you now?” |
9 | Content | Running head-start | A strategy for eliciting user motivational talk in which the coach asks open questions to first explore the perceived ‘good things’ about the status quo, in order to then query the ‘not so good things ‘about the status quo. | “What are the good things about (the status quo)?” / “What are the not-so-good things about (the status quo)?” / “What are the not-so-good things about changing (behaviour)?” |
10 | Content | Importance ruler | The coach asks open questions, using an importance ruler to explore the user’s motivation in terms of how important it is to make a behaviour change. A scale (typically 0–10) is often used to ask users to rate the importance of making a particular change. | “How important would you say it is for you to xxx?” / “On a scale of 0– 10, where 0 means not at all important and 10 means ‘the most important thing for me right now’, how important would you say it is for you to xxx?” |
11 | Content | Confidence ruler | The coach asks open questions, using a confidence ruler to explore the user’s motivation in terms of how confident they are to make a behaviour change. A scale (typically 0–10) is often used to ask users to rate their confidence in making a particular change. | “Again if 0 stands for not at all confident and 10 stands for very confident, what number would you give yourself and why?” |
12 | Content | DARN questions | The coach uses DARN questions (open-ended questions) that seek to elicit four subtypes of user motivational talk. These four subtypes are: Desire, Ability, Reason and Need. | “What do you hope you will accomplish by choosing that behaviour?” (D) “How could you do it differently, if you decided to?” (A) “What is the reason/need behind this change?” (R/N) |
13 | Content | Looking forward | The user is prompted to envision two possible futures. The first ‘future’ is if they continue on the same path without any changes where they might be five or ten years from now. The second future is if they decide to make a change, what their future might look like. | “If you were to make that change, how would things be different? What would it be like? How would you feel?” |
14 | Content | Looking back | The user is prompted by the coach to talk about what life was like ‘before’. The goal is for the user to observe how they have changed over time which may enhance motivation to return to a previous way of being. | A user may say: “I wasn’t always this way” and the coach may say: “It sounds like things have changed over time. Tell me about your eating habits back then”. |
15 | Content | Hypothetical thinking | The coach prompts the user to adopt hypothetical thinking to elicit ideas about behaviour change. | “Suppose that you did decide to change (behaviour) how would you go about it?” |
16 | Content | Query extremes | A technique used to evoke change talk by asking users to imagine best consequences of change or worst consequences of status quo. | “Suppose you did not change, what is the WORST thing that might happen?” |
17 | Content | Identify past successes | The coach prompts the user to think about previous successes at behavioural changes to build confidence for change. | “What have you learnt from previous attempts to change?” |
18 | Content | Identify strengths | The coach prompts the user to draw out their strengths and the relevance of these strengths to making successful behavioural changes. | “What are your key strengths?” |
19 | Content | Brainstorming | The coach prompts the user to generate a menu of options. | “What are your ideas about how you could change (behaviour)?” |
20 | Content | Troubleshooting | The coach prompts the user to think about potential barriers and identify ways of overcoming them to strengthen motivation. | “Suppose that this one big obstacle wasn’t there. If that obstacle was removed, then how might you go about making this change?” |
21 | Content | Values exploration (open or structured) | The coach prompts the user to explore his or her values and how the behaviour fits in with these values. The coach may ask the user to describe their main goals and values in life. | “What things are most important to you?” or “What do you most want in life?” and “How do your eating practices fit in with your goals and values?” |
22 | Content | Reframing | A coach’s reflective statement invites the user to consider a more positive and motivational interpretation of what has been said. | From “I can’t do it” to “So you find it difficult to ...” |
23 | Relational | Double-sided reflection | The coach provides a double-sided reflection to capture user ambivalence and communicate to the user that the coach heard their reasons both for and against change. | “On the one hand, you would like to change XX, but on the other hand, changing XX would mean giving up XX” or “you are torn about changing XX” |
24 | Relational | Emphasise autonomy | The coach provides a statement that directly expresses motivational support, acknowledging the user’s ability for choice and self-determination. | “Do you have any ideas about how we might resolve this dilemma?” |
25 | Relational | Overshooting | Overshooting is a motivational technique provided by the coach to argue against change by exaggerating the benefits of or minimising the harm associated with risky behaviour. | “So you see no benefit in changing XX” or “XX is all positive for you”. The coach, by arguing against change can exhaust the user’s negativity. |
26 | Relational | Undershooting | A reflective statement, provided by the coach that understates what the user has offered. By slightly understating the expressed intensity of emotion, the user is more likely to continue exploring and telling the coach about it. | The user says “I’m out of breath even walking up the stairs” and the coach responds with: “You’re beginning to notice that everyday activities are more difficult” |
27 | Relational | Coming alongside | A coach response to persistent resistance talk or discord in which the coach accepts and reflects the user’s resistance. | “Perhaps now is not the right time to be thinking about this change?” |
28 | Relational | Shifting focus | A coach responds to discord and low level of motivation by redirecting attention and discussion to a less contentious topic or perspective. | “Since you’ve been forced to come here, what would you like to do with the time we have left together today” |
29 | Relational | Agreement with a twist | A reflection whereby the coach reframes a negative comment by the user into a more positive response. | “I have no will power” to “So you’re saying that you have little confidence” |
30 | Content | Normalising | The coach communicates to users that having difficulties while changing is not uncommon. | “Many people report feeling like you do. They want to lose weight, but find it difficult” |
31 | Content | Explore change expectations | The coach prompts the user to identify the outcomes that the user expects to achieve based on the changes that they are motivated to make. | “Thinking about the benefits of (behaviour) that you’ve just been describing, what kinds of changes to your current level of (behaviour) are you prepared to make?” |
32 | Content | Consider change options | The coach prompts the user to consider change options in a neutral and supportive manner. | “How might you go about xxx?” |
33 | Content | Develop a change plan (CATs): Commitment, Activation, Taking Steps | The coach prompts the user to develop a specific change plan that the user is motivationally ready to accept. | “What do you intend to do specifically?” (C) “What would be a good first step?” (A) “When and how will that step be taken?” (T) |
34 | Content | Goal attainment scaling | A way to specify degrees of change towards the goal and focus motivation using a −3 to +3 scale where 0 is the status quo at the outset. The coach prompts the user to rate their goals on a scale ranging from the best possible outcome to the worst possible outcome. | Rate a weight loss goal on a scale ranging from −3 (most unfavourable outcome): gain 5 kg in one month to +3 (most favourable outcome): lose 5kg in one month where 0 is the status quo (remain at current weight) |
35 | Relational | Support change / persistence | The coach functions as a partner or companion, collaborating with the user’s own expertise. | “How can I best support you?” |
36 | Relational | Offer emotional support | The coach offers reassurance, to the user. | “I appreciate how difficult this is” |
37 | Content | Review outcome goal | The coach asks the user how they are progressing with their goals. | “How are you progressing with your goal?” |
38 | Content | Summarise the plan | The coach summarises the change plan including the specific behavioural goals, the reasons for making the change, the specific steps to be taken, the outcome goals and coping planning for relapse prevention. | “So you’ve decided you are going to ... This is because ... “ / “Specifically, you are going to ... You will know if the plan is working if ... |